법률칼럼

Legal Insights

Legal information on immigration, visas, criminal defense, and international divorce for foreign nationals.

법률칼럼Legal InsightForeigner2026. 05. 19

If you face criminal penalties related to forced deportation as a foreign national, here’s how to respond.

When a foreigner residing in South Korea is investigated or faces criminal penalties related to a criminal case, it is o

When a foreigner residing in South Korea is investigated or faces criminal penalties related to a criminal case, it is often assumed that the process will simply end with the payment of a fine. However, in reality, after a criminal penalty is imposed, additional reviews or measures may be taken during immigration procedures. For example, if the fine exceeds a certain amount or if there is a history of previous penalties, visa renewal may be denied or extending the stay in the country may become difficult. These administrative decisions are often communicated after the trial has concluded, making it hard to anticipate the related procedures in advance. Because immigration-related procedures vary depending on the case, it is advantageous to carefully establish a response strategy from the beginning. In particular, a legal representative specializing in immigration cases with years of experience can anticipate the link between criminal cases and stay restrictions and propose strategies to prevent problems before they arise. A response strategy that considers both the criminal case and the immigration status is more reliably designed when prepared together with a legal representative. Since even seemingly minor incidents can lead to forced deportation of foreigners, it is important to set the right course from the outset.

Contents

CHECK POINT
1.
A criminal penalty alone can trigger immigration screening.
2.
What responses are possible when forced deportation is being considered?
3.
Why is the assistance of a legal representative necessary in cases of forced deportation of foreigners?
4.
Actual case where a reduced fine helped prevent forced deportation.
5.
Final words.

1. A criminal penalty alone can trigger immigration screening.

If a penalty exceeding certain thresholds is imposed, the record may be separately reviewed during immigration procedures. When a foreigner is convicted in a criminal case, the administrative authorities may conduct a separate process to reconsider whether the individual can continue to stay in the country, depending on the details of the verdict.

i
Below are typical criteria that can actually have an impact:
If a fine of 3 million KRW or more is imposed: Even a single conviction can trigger administrative review.

If the cumulative fines exceed 5 million KRW within the past 3 years: Accumulated penalties exceeding a certain amount automatically lead to review, which may result in restrictions on visa renewal or re-entry.

If a prison sentence or higher is confirmed: Regardless of whether actual imprisonment is served, this is likely to be considered a ground for disadvantage under immigration regulations.

Immigration-related decisions are made separately from criminal trials, and there are many cases where stay restrictions apply regardless of the court’s judgment. Therefore, it is important to recognize these criteria early on and establish a response strategy from the initial stage.

2. What responses are possible when forced deportation is being considered?

How you approach the situation strategically can be more important than when you start responding. If a criminal penalty exceeds certain thresholds, immigration authorities will separately determine whether the foreigner can continue to stay. If no action is taken during this time, there are cases where visa renewal is denied or a deportation order is issued without change.

RESPONSE
Adjust the criminal penalty to stay below the fine threshold
For example, try to negotiate sentencing so that the fine does not exceed 3 million KRW, which is a criterion for forced deportation.
Submit supporting documents to prove stability of life and remorse
Various materials such as victim agreements, employer confirmations, and character references can be submitted.
Submit a written opinion to the administrative agency
Present a statement summarizing the necessity to stay based on family, livelihood, employment, and other circumstances to influence the decision.
Respond through administrative appeals or lawsuits
If a forced deportation decision has already been made, formal procedures can be used to raise objections.

3. Why is the assistance of a legal representative necessary in cases of forced deportation of foreigners?

There are many cases where, after a criminal case has ended, immigration screening procedures begin without separate notification, and the individual only learns of this belatedly. The conclusion of a criminal trial does not mean all related procedures have ended.

i
The conclusion of a criminal trial does not automatically guarantee the right to remain in the country.
Based on the fine amount, prior convictions, and the judgment details, the immigration office may initiate a separate decision-making process.

At this stage, responding only to the criminal case does not automatically guarantee the right to remain in the country. Responses can be carried out in the following stages:

4. Actual case where a reduced fine helped prevent forced deportation.

The client, an ethnic Korean from China, had been diligently working at their job for over three years. One day, while entering an intersection on the way home from work, they failed to notice the traffic signal and proceeded, resulting in a collision with a pedestrian crossing in a no-crossing zone. The pedestrian suffered fractures, and the client faced not only criminal penalties but also the possibility of a deportation order under the Immigration Control Act.

The legal representative submitted a petition from the company, work history records, and details of the settlement with the victim. They also explained the potential livelihood hardships and collapse of the client’s living foundation if deported. During the criminal trial, a strategy was employed to adjust the fine so that it would not exceed the deportation threshold, requesting leniency.

RESULT
Maintaining existing residence status
As a result, the client was fined 2.5 million KRW and was excluded from the forced deportation list, allowing them to maintain their existing residence status and continue living in Korea.

5. Final words

Forced deportation of foreigners can require different responses depending on the situation. Even if the legal issues are resolved, the decision regarding continued stay in the country is not made immediately. When a foreigner receives a fine or imprisonment sentence, the details are forwarded to administrative authorities, who then review whether the individual can remain or must leave the country. As a result, there are many cases where administrative measures such as visa renewal denial or entry restrictions are imposed.

However, if the cause of the case, the level of penalty, and the current stay situation are thoroughly explained and responded to according to administrative procedures, there is a possibility to continue living in Korea. Since these matters involve both criminal judgments and administrative actions, it is difficult to change the outcome by simply submitting documents. If you want to set and prepare a strategy from the beginning, it is safer to seek assistance from a legal representative.

Unexpected situations especially require prepared responses to change outcomes. Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese. Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case. Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju. Don’t face the legal system alone. Let Majung fight for you!

Forced deportation cases involving foreigners require careful review because they involve both criminal procedures and immigration administrative decisions. Preparing an appropriate response strategy from the early stage can help reduce potential disadvantages depending on the circumstances of the case.

i
Early preparation can be important in cases involving criminal penalties and immigration procedures.
Because immigration decisions are made separately from criminal judgments, it is necessary to consider both the criminal case and the individual’s residence status when establishing a response direction.

If you want to set and prepare a strategy from the beginning, it is safer to seek assistance from a legal representative. Unexpected situations especially require prepared responses to change outcomes.

RESPONSE
Criminal procedure and immigration procedure should be considered together
A response limited only to the criminal case may not sufficiently address later immigration reviews. Considering the possible impact on residence status from the beginning can be important.
Objective materials can support the necessity of continued stay
Documents regarding employment, family relationships, settlement, residence history, and other circumstances may be reviewed depending on the situation.
Professional review can help establish an appropriate direction
Since each foreigner’s residence status, criminal history, and personal circumstances are different, the response method may vary depending on the details of the case.

Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese. Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case.

Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju.

Don’t face the legal system alone. Let Majung fight for you!

상담 신청하기

Online
Phone KakaoTalk Online