If you are a foreign national living in Korea, there is one law you must comply with: the Immigration Control Act. This law does not only govern entry procedures. It also contains rules that directly affect daily life, including the length of stay, employment registration, and reporting of family relationships.
The problem is that even a simple oversight—such as forgetting to file a report, having an incorrect employment arrangement, or failing to properly prove a marital relationship—can be treated as a violation of the Immigration Control Act. A single mistake can place you under offender review, and if this leads to a deportation order, the entire foundation of your life in Korea may collapse.
Contents
1. What Procedures Begin When a Foreigner Violates the Immigration Control Act?
2. Not All Offender Review Outcomes Result in Deportation
3. There Is Still Room to Challenge a Deportation Order
4. An Immigration Control Act Violation Caused by a Mistake: A Real Case That Reversed the Decision
5. In Immigration Control Act Violations, Delayed Action Means Lost Opportunities
1. What Procedures Begin When a Foreigner Violates the Immigration Control Act?
When a violation of the Immigration Control Act by a foreign national staying in Korea is confirmed, the matter is unlikely to be resolved through a simple expression of remorse. Based on established criteria, the Ministry of Justice designates the individual for offender review and begins an in-depth examination of whether their stay status should be maintained.
At this stage, the core of the review is not limited to the legal provisions themselves, but extends to an overall assessment of the individual’s life and settlement in Korea. In particular, the following factors are typically investigated:
Depending on the outcome of the review, measures such as deportation or restrictions on re-entry may be imposed. Decisions tend to be especially strict in cases involving illegal employment, sham marriages, or serious criminal activity.
An important point to note is that even if the individual receives a decision of non-indictment or no charges in criminal proceedings, immigration authorities may still issue a deportation decision through a separate administrative process. Therefore, from the early stage at which a violation is confirmed, it is safest to respond strategically while taking into account the possibility of objections and administrative litigation.
2. Not All Offender Review Outcomes Result in Deportation
Even when a violation of the Immigration Control Act is confirmed, the outcome of the offender review does not automatically result in deportation. Depending on the nature of the case and the surrounding circumstances, the Ministry of Justice may decide on one of the following measures:
3. There Is Still Room to Challenge a Deportation Order
Even if a deportation order is issued, it does not mean that all procedures have come to an end. Even when a deportation decision is made through offender review due to a violation of the Immigration Control Act, it is still possible to request a reconsideration if certain requirements are met. The most commonly used methods include the following:
However, a decision is unlikely to be reversed based solely on a claim of unfairness. The following grounds must be explained concretely and supported by facts:
4. An Immigration Control Act Violation Caused by a Mistake: A Real Case That Reversed the Decision
Mr. H, a Turkish national, was prosecuted for violating the Infectious Disease Control and Prevention Act after visiting an immigration office during his self-quarantine period shortly after entering Korea on a D-4 visa. At the time, Mr. H had mistakenly misunderstood the registration deadline for his educational institute and went to submit required documents. The purpose of his visit was solely to comply with visa requirements. However, the issue was that this visit occurred during the quarantine period, which ultimately led to criminal charges for violating quarantine guidelines. Had this punishment been finalized, there was a possibility that a departure order could be issued, putting at risk not only his stay in Korea but also the life he was preparing to build with his fiancée.
Based on these points, they emphasized that the incident was not an intentional violation but a mere administrative mistake. The court accepted these circumstances and issued a suspension of sentence (deferred sentencing), and as a result, the case was concluded without proceeding to offender review.
5. In Immigration Control Act Violations, Delayed Action Means Lost Opportunities
Once a violation of the Immigration Control Act is confirmed, the matter does not end with a simple penalty. It can lead to measures that affect every aspect of daily life, including cancellation of stay status, deportation, and restrictions on re-entry.
These procedures are difficult to handle alone, and they require a strategic approach that takes into account whether the requirements for objection are met as well as the possibility of administrative litigation. Based on our experience in handling immigration cases, we provide step-by-step support, from filing objections to deportation orders to pursuing administrative litigation.
After receiving a notice of disposition, promptly analyzing the case with an expert in immigration law and identifying realistic solutions is an important step in responding effectively.
Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese. Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case. Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju.
