법률칼럼

Legal Insights

Legal information on immigration, visas, criminal defense, and international divorce for foreign nationals.

법률칼럼Legal InsightForeigner2026. 09. 23

[legal lawyer near me] Foreign Voice Phishing Collection Cases in Korea

CONTENTS Contents 01 Why can someone be accused of voice phishing even if they only delivered cash? 02 How is the statem

썸네일
CONTENTS
Contents
01
Why can someone be accused of voice phishing even if they only delivered cash?
02
How is the statement “I did not know it was voice phishing” evaluated?
03
Deleting messages before police investigation may cause additional problems
04
Foreign voice phishing collection cases are not only about criminal punishment
05
Foreign criminal cases should be reviewed together with immigration issues from the beginning
"Someone told me to just receive money and deliver it.”
“I really did not know it was a voice phishing crime.”
“I thought it was just a simple part-time job available in Korea.”

These are statements frequently heard in foreign voice phishing collection cases.

Some foreign nationals and international students who are unfamiliar with life in Korea are approached through SNS or messaging applications with offers of high-paying part-time work. They are then instructed to collect cash from certain locations and deliver it to another person.

At first, they may believe that they are delivering goods or transferring company funds. However, after being arrested by the police, they realize that they may have become involved in a voice phishing crime.

i
The problem is that foreign voice phishing collection cases may not be treated as a simple mistake during part-time work.

These cases can lead not only to criminal procedures but also to immigration issues regarding residence status in Korea. Therefore, from the early stage of the case, it is important to carefully organize what instructions the person received and what they actually understood about the situation.

A legal lawyer near me experienced in foreign criminal cases can help review the facts of the case and prepare an appropriate response strategy considering both criminal procedures and immigration issues.

01

Why can someone be accused of voice phishing even if they only delivered cash?

Voice phishing organizations do not always operate with one person handling the entire crime.

Instead, different people may perform different roles, such as:

Contacting victims by phone
Receiving cash from victims
Delivering collected money to other members of the organization

The person who directly receives cash from victims and transfers it to someone designated by the organization is commonly referred to as a “collection agent.”

Some foreign nationals investigated as voice phishing collection agents believe that they are unrelated to the crime because they never deceived victims directly and never made phone calls.

However, investigators do not only examine who personally made false statements to victims.

They may also review:

CHECK POINT
01
How the person was recruited
02
How many times cash was collected
03
The amount of money delivered
04
How payment was received

Therefore, simply explaining that “I was not the person who made the phone call” may not fully explain the important issues of the case.

The investigation may focus on whether the person understood their role and whether they should have recognized that the activity was related to a criminal organization.

02

How is the statement “I did not know it was voice phishing” evaluated?

One of the most important issues in foreign voice phishing collection cases is whether the person was aware of the criminal activity.

Some foreign nationals become involved in crimes while searching for employment through online recruitment websites or SNS platforms.

Especially when a person is unfamiliar with Korean language or Korean financial and employment systems, it may be necessary to examine whether they genuinely failed to recognize that the work instructions were unusual.

i
However, simply stating “I did not know” does not automatically resolve the issue.

During the investigation, authorities may review:

Recruitment advertisements
Messenger conversations
How work instructions were provided
Locations where cash was collected
Methods of delivery
Amount of payment received

For example, if communication only occurred through Telegram or other private messaging apps, if different people provided cash each time, or if the person was instructed to transfer money to unknown third parties, these circumstances may become important issues.

On the other hand, if the person had a reasonable reason to believe that the job was legitimate, evidence showing how they came to accept the employment offer should be prepared.

Foreign voice phishing collection cases are ultimately not determined by one sentence saying “I did not know.” Instead, the entire situation and surrounding circumstances may be reviewed to determine whether the person had criminal awareness.

03

Deleting messages before police investigation may cause additional problems

When foreign nationals suddenly receive contact from the police, they may panic and delete information from their phones.

Some may delete conversations with voice phishing organizations or reset their devices.

However, this action requires careful consideration.

In foreign voice phishing collection cases, deleting information may also remove important evidence showing:

How the person found the job advertisement
How the other person explained the work
What instructions were provided

The following materials may become important when organizing the facts of the case:

Screenshots of recruitment advertisements
Telegram, WeChat, or other messenger conversations
Text messages
Call records
Bank transaction records
Travel and movement records

For foreign nationals especially, it is also necessary to consider whether language difficulties caused misunderstandings about the instructions they received.

Therefore, before police questioning, it is important not to rely only on memory but to organize the facts chronologically based on objective materials and actual movements.

A legal lawyer near me who handles foreign criminal cases can help review available evidence and determine how the facts should be presented during the investigation.

04

Foreign voice phishing collection cases are not only about criminal punishment

There is an important issue that foreign nationals often overlook.

It is the immigration problem that may arise after the criminal procedure.

For Korean citizens, the response to a criminal case is usually focused on the investigation process, prosecution decision, and court result.

However, foreign nationals must also consider how the criminal outcome may affect their current visa status, reason for staying in Korea, and future immigration procedures.

Foreign voice phishing collection cases should also be reviewed with the possibility that criminal procedures may later be connected to immigration issues.

For example:

CHECK POINT
International students may face issues related to their studies and extension of stay.
Marriage immigrants may need to consider their family relationships and life foundation in Korea.

Therefore, when deciding what statements to make and what evidence to submit during the criminal process, it is important to consider possible immigration consequences as well.

Waiting until the criminal case is completely finished before reviewing immigration issues may result in insufficient time to respond.

FINAL NOTE

Foreign criminal cases should be reviewed together with immigration issues from the beginning

If you are suspected of being involved in a foreign voice phishing collection case, the first step is to accurately understand your actual role.

Important points to organize include:

How many times you collected cash
The amount of money involved
What conversations you had with other participants
How much payment you received for the activity

In addition, it is necessary to review:

Current visa status
Length of stay in Korea
Family relationships
Academic or employment situation
i
Especially if the person claims that they “thought it was only a part-time job,” repeating this statement alone may not be enough.
It is important to explain why the person believed it was legitimate work and support that explanation with objective facts and evidence.

If you are unfamiliar with Korean language and feel concerned about police investigation, or if the case has already moved to the prosecution or court stage, it is important to first identify the current stage of the procedure.

Foreign voice phishing collection cases can involve both criminal punishment and immigration consequences.

Therefore, it is important to understand what allegations are being made, what actions investigators are focusing on, and what response strategy is appropriate for the specific circumstances of the case.

Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese.  

Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case.  

Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju

Don’t face the legal system alone. Let Majung fight for you!

홈페이지 상담 신청 링크 상담 전화 링크 카카오톡 상담 링크 이메일 상담 링크

Practice Area

업무분야

같은 업무분야의 다른 게시글을 계속 확인할 수 있습니다.

상담 신청하기

Online
Phone KakaoTalk Online